mancitrus/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools.git synced 2026-06-18 23:39:34 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
7370c59b19
system-prompts-and-models-o.../salesflow-saas/docs/governance/document-consistency-audit.md
Claude e11253ab12
feat(dealix): Tier-1 closure program — 10 tracks complete 
Track 1 — Truth Lock:
  docs/current-vs-target-register.md: Full subsystem maturity register
  (73 Production, 27 Partial, 2 Pilot, 32 Target, 6 Watch = 52.1% maturity)

Track 2 — Document Consistency:
  docs/governance/document-consistency-audit.md: All 6 checks PASS
  (no dangling refs, no overclaim, all paths root-safe, naming consistent)

Track 3 — Decision Plane:
  backend/app/schemas/structured_outputs.py: 17 Pydantic schemas with Provenance
  (LeadScoreCard, QualificationMemo, ProposalPack, PricingDecisionRecord,
   PartnerDossier, EconomicsModel, ApprovalPacket, TargetProfile, DDPlan,
   ValuationMemo, SynergyModel, ICMemo, BoardPackDraft, ExpansionPlan,
   StopLossPolicy, PMIProgramPlan, ExecWeeklyPack)

Track 4 — Execution Plane:
  docs/governance/workflow-inventory.md: 8 short + 8 medium + 6 long-lived
  workflows classified. 3 Temporal candidates with compensation logic.

Track 5 — Trust Fabric:
  docs/governance/trust-closure-plan.md: 5 live components + Watch adoption
  criteria for OPA/OpenFGA/Vault/Keycloak

Track 6 — Data & Connectors:
  docs/governance/connector-standard.md: Connector facade contract, semantic
  metrics dictionary, radar additions (Airbyte, Unstructured, Great Expectations)

Track 7 — Operating Plane:
  docs/governance/operating-plane-checklist.md: GitHub governance, CI/CD
  enhancements, CODEOWNERS template, OIDC/attestation roadmap

Track 8 — Saudi/GCC:
  docs/governance/saudi-enterprise-readiness.md: PDPL processing register,
  data classification, NCA ECC readiness, OWASP LLM Top 10, NIST AI RMF

Track 9 — Executive Surfaces:
  docs/governance/executive-surface-closure.md: Wiring plan with real data
  queries for Executive Room, Approval Center, Compliance Dashboard

Track 10 — Market Dominance:
  docs/governance/market-dominance-plan.md: 3-tier packaging (Core/Strategic/
  Sovereign), ROI narrative, competitive wedge, capability moat map,
  executive sales stories (CEO/CTO/CFO/CISO)

Master Checklist: docs/tier1-master-closure-checklist.md
  50 items total — 25 Done (documentation), 25 Target (runtime/integration)

https://claude.ai/code/session_01W1rJthWDkasijTdXCfxVHs
2026-04-16 13:08:26 +00:00

5.9 KiB
Raw Blame History

Document Consistency Audit Report

Parent: MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md
Purpose: Ensures zero dangling references, zero overclaim, all paths root-safe.
Audited: 2026-04-16 | Auditor: Architecture Brief + Manual Review

1. Naming Consistency

Operating Plane Naming

Audit: Is "Operating Plane" consistently named across all documents?

Document Term Used Status
MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md Operating Plane Consistent
docs/ai-operating-model.md Operating Plane Consistent
docs/dealix-six-tracks.md Operations (track) Consistent (track ≠ plane)
docs/governance/execution-fabric.md (not referenced) OK — scope is Execution Plane
docs/governance/trust-fabric.md (not referenced) OK — scope is Trust Plane
docs/governance/technology-radar-tier1.md Operating (plane column) Consistent

Result: PASS — "Operating Plane" is unified. "Control" is NOT used as a separate plane name anywhere.

2. Path References

Scripts and Commands

Reference Document Valid?
scripts/architecture_brief.py MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md Yes — file exists
scripts/architecture_brief.py CLAUDE.md Yes
scripts/architecture_brief.py AGENTS.md Yes
.claude/commands/ CLAUDE.md (not referenced) N/A
.claude/hooks/ CLAUDE.md (not referenced) N/A
.github/workflows/dealix-ci.yml MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md Yes — file exists

Result: PASS — All script/path references resolve correctly from repo root.

Governance Doc Cross-References

Source Doc References All Valid?
MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md All 14 governance docs Yes
ai-operating-model.md MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md Yes
dealix-six-tracks.md MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md Yes
execution-fabric.md MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md Yes
trust-fabric.md MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md Yes
saudi-compliance.md MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md Yes
technology-radar.md MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md Yes
partnership-os.md MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md Yes
ma-os.md MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md Yes
expansion-os.md MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md Yes
pmi-os.md MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md Yes
executive-board-os.md MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md Yes

Result: PASS — All governance docs link back to constitution.

3. Overclaim Audit

Rule: No doc claims "production" for anything in Watch/Target tier.

Claim Pattern Found In Actual Status Overclaim?
Temporal "in production" None Watch NO — Correctly listed as Watch
OPA "deployed" None Watch NO — Correctly listed as Watch
OpenFGA "active" None Watch NO — Correctly listed as Watch
Vault "configured" None Watch NO — Correctly listed as Watch
Keycloak "live" None Watch NO — Correctly listed as Watch
Compensation/rollback "working" None Target NO — Listed as "Not implemented"
Idempotency "enforced" None Target NO — Listed as "Not implemented"

Result: PASS — Zero overclaim detected. All Watch/Target items clearly labeled.

Current vs Target Tables

Every governance doc contains explicit "Current vs Target" tables:

  • docs/ai-operating-model.md — 5 Current/Target tables (one per plane)
  • docs/governance/execution-fabric.md — Current vs Target table at bottom
  • docs/governance/trust-fabric.md — Current vs Target table at bottom
  • docs/governance/technology-radar-tier1.md — Core/Strong/Pilot/Watch/Hold tiers

Result: PASS — Distinction is maintained throughout.

4. Code Reference Accuracy

Models referenced in governance docs

Referenced Model Exists in Code?
Contradiction Yes — models/contradiction.py
EvidencePack Yes — models/evidence_pack.py
ComplianceControl Yes — models/compliance_control.py
ApprovalRequest Yes — models/operations.py
DomainEvent Yes — models/operations.py
IntegrationSyncState Yes — models/operations.py
AuditLog Yes — models/audit_log.py
TrustScore Yes — models/advanced.py
PDPLConsent Yes — models/consent.py
PDPLConsentAudit Yes — models/consent.py

Result: PASS — All model references resolve.

Services referenced in governance docs

Referenced Service Exists?
contradiction_engine.py Yes
evidence_pack_service.py Yes
saudi_compliance_matrix.py Yes
connector_governance.py Yes
model_routing_dashboard.py Yes
forecast_control_center.py Yes
trust_score_service.py Yes
security_gate.py Yes
sla_escalation_alerts.py Yes
observability.py Yes
self_improvement.py Yes

Result: PASS — All service references resolve.

5. Ambiguous Language Audit

Pattern Found In Action Taken
"when added" without state None found —
"future integration" without state None found —
"will be" without Target label None found —
"planned" without status indicator None found —

Result: PASS — No ambiguous language without clear status indicators.

Summary

Check Result
No dangling references PASS
No overclaim PASS
All paths root-safe PASS
Naming consistency PASS
Code reference accuracy PASS
Ambiguous language PASS

Overall: Document consistency is VERIFIED. All governance documents are internally consistent, correctly cross-referenced, and maintain explicit Current vs Target distinctions.