020868a773
TASK-999 — State Audit (docs/internal/STATE_AUDIT.md):
Answered all 9 pre-execution questions with evidence:
- Repo: still inside forked prompts repo (BLOCKER)
- Tests: CI failing (dependency drift, not code)
- RLS: migration exists, not applied to production
- Idempotency: middleware exists, not in app stack
- OTel: gateway spans only, packages not in requirements
- Production: none, $0 infrastructure, $0 LLM, no customers
TASK-010 — Canonical Truth Registry (docs/registry/TRUTH.yaml):
15 capabilities classified: 7 live, 4 partial, 4 roadmap.
LLM policy, data residency, security claims all documented
with honest status (soc2: false, rls: false, pdpl: in-progress).
TASK-010 — Claims Registry (commercial/claims_registry.yaml):
8 approved claims (backed by runtime evidence)
2 restricted claims (need qualifier)
8 forbidden claims (never say: "enterprise-grade", "SOC 2 compliant",
"better than Salesforce", "10x revenue", "full autonomy", etc.)
Execution log started at docs/execution_log.md.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01W1rJthWDkasijTdXCfxVHs
4.2 KiB
STATE AUDIT — Dealix Pre-Execution Assessment
Date: 2026-04-17
Auditor: Claude Code (automated)
Scope: Answer all §1.4 questions from DEALIX_EXECUTION_BLUEPRINT.md
Q1: Is the project still a fork of system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools?
Answer: YES — Dealix currently lives inside salesflow-saas/ subdirectory of VoXc2/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools, which is a repository containing leaked AI tool prompts from 45+ vendors.
Risk: Commercial, legal, and reputational. Core IP shares a repo with leaked/extracted prompts.
Action: TASK-001 (repository separation) is BLOCKER.
Q2: What is the actual Python test pass rate?
Answer: UNKNOWN (CI failing due to pre-existing dependency drift).
Evidence:
- 19 test files exist in
backend/tests/ - 1,073 total lines of test code
- CI exit code 4 (pytest collection error) on all commits after
a319feb - Root cause: unpinned transitive dependency updated on PyPI between CI runs
- Router.py and pytest.ini byte-identical between passing and failing commits
Action: TASK-003 (dependency lockfile with uv) will resolve this.
Q3: What is the actual RLS coverage per table?
Answer: MIGRATION EXISTS but NOT APPLIED to production.
Evidence:
alembic/versions/20260417_0002_add_rls.py— migration defines RLS for 23 tablesdatabase_rls.py— helpers for SET LOCAL app.tenant_idmiddleware/tenant_rls.py— extracts tenant_id from JWT- Current state: Migration exists in code but no production PostgreSQL to apply it to
Action: Apply migration on first production deployment.
Q4: Which external actions actually have idempotency keys?
Answer: MIDDLEWARE EXISTS but NOT YET INTEGRATED into specific routes.
Evidence:
models/idempotency_key.py— table definedservices/idempotency_service.py— get_existing/store logicmiddleware/idempotency.py— HTTP middleware checks Idempotency-Key header- Not integrated: Middleware not added to FastAPI app middleware stack
Action: Add middleware to app initialization in main.py.
Q5: Which code paths actually emit OTel spans?
Answer: ONE code path — OpenClaw gateway.
Evidence:
observability/otel.py— init_otel/span/inject_correlation_id (graceful degradation)openclaw/gateway.py— wraps execute() in span with correlation_id bridge- NOT instrumented: Individual golden path stages, LLM calls, DB queries, HTTP handlers
- OTel packages NOT in requirements.txt — installed as optional
Action: Add OTel packages to requirements, instrument golden path stages.
Q6: Is there any production traffic today?
Answer: NO — based on repo evidence.
Evidence:
- No production deployment configuration found
- No monitoring/alerting setup active
- docker-compose.yml exists for local dev
- No Kubernetes, Terraform, or cloud deployment files
Q7: Are there any active paying customers?
Answer: NO — no billing records, no customer data, no invoices.
Evidence: Revenue activation docs exist as plans, not records.
Q8: What is the current infrastructure cost/month?
Answer: ~$0 (development only, no production infrastructure running).
Q9: What are the LLM costs/month and which providers?
Answer: $0 in production. Configured providers:
| Provider | Model | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Groq | llama-3.3-70b | Configured as primary |
| OpenAI | gpt-4o | Configured as fallback |
| Claude | opus-4-6 | In model_router |
| Gemini | 2.0-flash | Pilot |
| DeepSeek | coder | Pilot |
No production API keys observed. All testing/development.
Summary
| Question | Status |
|---|---|
| Repo separated? | NO — BLOCKER |
| Tests passing? | NO — dependency drift |
| RLS coverage? | CODE EXISTS — not applied |
| Idempotency? | CODE EXISTS — not integrated |
| OTel spans? | 1 PATH — gateway only |
| Production traffic? | NONE |
| Paying customers? | NONE |
| Infrastructure cost? | $0 |
| LLM cost? | $0 |
Verdict: Dealix is a pre-revenue, pre-production project with strong architecture but no live deployment. TASK-001 (repo separation) and TASK-003 (dependency fix) are true blockers.