# Document Consistency Audit Report

> **Parent**: [`MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md`](../../MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md)  
> **Purpose**: Ensures zero dangling references, zero overclaim, all paths root-safe.  
> **Audited**: 2026-04-16 | **Auditor**: Architecture Brief + Manual Review

---

## 1. Naming Consistency

### Operating Plane Naming
**Audit**: Is "Operating Plane" consistently named across all documents?

| Document | Term Used | Status |
|----------|-----------|--------|
| `MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md` | Operating Plane | Consistent |
| `docs/ai-operating-model.md` | Operating Plane | Consistent |
| `docs/dealix-six-tracks.md` | Operations (track) | Consistent (track ≠ plane) |
| `docs/governance/execution-fabric.md` | (not referenced) | OK — scope is Execution Plane |
| `docs/governance/trust-fabric.md` | (not referenced) | OK — scope is Trust Plane |
| `docs/governance/technology-radar-tier1.md` | Operating (plane column) | Consistent |

**Result**: **PASS** — "Operating Plane" is unified. "Control" is NOT used as a separate plane name anywhere.

---

## 2. Path References

### Scripts and Commands
| Reference | Document | Valid? |
|-----------|----------|--------|
| `scripts/architecture_brief.py` | MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md | Yes — file exists |
| `scripts/architecture_brief.py` | CLAUDE.md | Yes |
| `scripts/architecture_brief.py` | AGENTS.md | Yes |
| `.claude/commands/` | CLAUDE.md (not referenced) | N/A |
| `.claude/hooks/` | CLAUDE.md (not referenced) | N/A |
| `.github/workflows/dealix-ci.yml` | MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md | Yes — file exists |

**Result**: **PASS** — All script/path references resolve correctly from repo root.

### Governance Doc Cross-References
| Source Doc | References | All Valid? |
|-----------|-----------|------------|
| MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md | All 14 governance docs | Yes |
| ai-operating-model.md | MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md | Yes |
| dealix-six-tracks.md | MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md | Yes |
| execution-fabric.md | MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md | Yes |
| trust-fabric.md | MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md | Yes |
| saudi-compliance.md | MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md | Yes |
| technology-radar.md | MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md | Yes |
| partnership-os.md | MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md | Yes |
| ma-os.md | MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md | Yes |
| expansion-os.md | MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md | Yes |
| pmi-os.md | MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md | Yes |
| executive-board-os.md | MASTER_OPERATING_PROMPT.md | Yes |

**Result**: **PASS** — All governance docs link back to constitution.

---

## 3. Overclaim Audit

### Rule: No doc claims "production" for anything in Watch/Target tier.

| Claim Pattern | Found In | Actual Status | Overclaim? |
|--------------|----------|---------------|------------|
| Temporal "in production" | None | Watch | **NO** — Correctly listed as Watch |
| OPA "deployed" | None | Watch | **NO** — Correctly listed as Watch |
| OpenFGA "active" | None | Watch | **NO** — Correctly listed as Watch |
| Vault "configured" | None | Watch | **NO** — Correctly listed as Watch |
| Keycloak "live" | None | Watch | **NO** — Correctly listed as Watch |
| Compensation/rollback "working" | None | Target | **NO** — Listed as "Not implemented" |
| Idempotency "enforced" | None | Target | **NO** — Listed as "Not implemented" |

**Result**: **PASS** — Zero overclaim detected. All Watch/Target items clearly labeled.

### Current vs Target Tables
Every governance doc contains explicit "Current vs Target" tables:
- `docs/ai-operating-model.md` — 5 Current/Target tables (one per plane)
- `docs/governance/execution-fabric.md` — Current vs Target table at bottom
- `docs/governance/trust-fabric.md` — Current vs Target table at bottom
- `docs/governance/technology-radar-tier1.md` — Core/Strong/Pilot/Watch/Hold tiers

**Result**: **PASS** — Distinction is maintained throughout.

---

## 4. Code Reference Accuracy

### Models referenced in governance docs
| Referenced Model | Exists in Code? |
|-----------------|-----------------|
| `Contradiction` | Yes — `models/contradiction.py` |
| `EvidencePack` | Yes — `models/evidence_pack.py` |
| `ComplianceControl` | Yes — `models/compliance_control.py` |
| `ApprovalRequest` | Yes — `models/operations.py` |
| `DomainEvent` | Yes — `models/operations.py` |
| `IntegrationSyncState` | Yes — `models/operations.py` |
| `AuditLog` | Yes — `models/audit_log.py` |
| `TrustScore` | Yes — `models/advanced.py` |
| `PDPLConsent` | Yes — `models/consent.py` |
| `PDPLConsentAudit` | Yes — `models/consent.py` |

**Result**: **PASS** — All model references resolve.

### Services referenced in governance docs
| Referenced Service | Exists? |
|-------------------|---------|
| `contradiction_engine.py` | Yes |
| `evidence_pack_service.py` | Yes |
| `saudi_compliance_matrix.py` | Yes |
| `connector_governance.py` | Yes |
| `model_routing_dashboard.py` | Yes |
| `forecast_control_center.py` | Yes |
| `trust_score_service.py` | Yes |
| `security_gate.py` | Yes |
| `sla_escalation_alerts.py` | Yes |
| `observability.py` | Yes |
| `self_improvement.py` | Yes |

**Result**: **PASS** — All service references resolve.

---

## 5. Ambiguous Language Audit

| Pattern | Found In | Action Taken |
|---------|----------|-------------|
| "when added" without state | None found | — |
| "future integration" without state | None found | — |
| "will be" without Target label | None found | — |
| "planned" without status indicator | None found | — |

**Result**: **PASS** — No ambiguous language without clear status indicators.

---

## Summary

| Check | Result |
|-------|--------|
| No dangling references | **PASS** |
| No overclaim | **PASS** |
| All paths root-safe | **PASS** |
| Naming consistency | **PASS** |
| Code reference accuracy | **PASS** |
| Ambiguous language | **PASS** |

**Overall**: Document consistency is **VERIFIED**. All governance documents are internally consistent, correctly cross-referenced, and maintain explicit Current vs Target distinctions.